top of page
Search

Is Long-Term Residential Rehab Back? The 2025 UK Guidelines Give It the Green Light


For years, many commissioners, politicians and even some clinicians treated long-term residential rehab as an expensive luxury - something that belonged to the 1980s Minnesota Model era rather than a modern, “community-first” system.


The new Clinical Guidelines for Alcohol Treatment, published on 28 November 2025, have just changed the conversation.

Chapter 14 – Residential Treatment and Intensive Structured Day Programmes – is unequivocal: **long-term residential rehabilitation (3–12 months and sometimes longer) is a clinically recommended, evidence-informed option** for people with severe and complex alcohol dependence.


This isn’t a footnote. It’s a full-throated endorsement.


What the guidelines actually say :


Longer-term residential rehabilitation can be “particularly effective” for individuals with:

– severe dependence and repeated failed community attempts

– co-occurring mental health disorders

– housing instability or homelessness

– high-risk environments they need to be removed from

– trauma histories or criminal justice involvement


- These programmes are defined as intensive, structured, abstinence-oriented communities offering 24-hour support, group therapy, individual counselling, family work, life-skills training, and staged reintegration.


- Length of stay should be individually planned, not capped by arbitrary funding rules. The guidance explicitly recognises 3 to 12 month programmes and notes that some people may need longer.


- Aftercare, relapse-prevention planning, and access to recovery housing are described as essential – not optional extras.


Why this matters in 2025


1. **Evidence, not ideology**

The guidelines were developed with OHID, PHE successors, NICE experts, people with lived experience, and leading clinicians. They reviewed the latest UK and international studies showing that, for the most complex cohort, longer residential stays produce significantly better abstinence and social reintegration outcomes than short detox-plus-CBT packages.


2. **Health inequalities front and centre**

The document repeatedly highlights groups who have historically been failed by short interventions: rough sleepers, prison leavers, victims of domestic abuse, veterans, and those with childhood trauma. Long-term rehab is positioned as a key tool for reaching these populations.


3. **Commissioners now have cover**

Local authorities and Integrated Care Boards can no longer dismiss 6 to 12 month rehab as “not evidence-based” or “too expensive”. The national clinical guidelines say otherwise.


Expect funding battles in 2026, but the clinical argument has been won.

For too long the debate was framed as “community vs residential”. The new guidelines reframe it correctly: different tiers for different needs. Some people stabilise with a brief intervention and a few weeks of acamprosate. Others need immersion, structure, and time - lots of time - to rebuild a life worth staying sober for.


The next step


If you’re a commissioner, service manager, or peer advocate: read Chapter 14 tonight.

If you’re referring clients or supporting a loved one: long-term rehab is no longer a fringe option - it’s national guidance.


The full chapter is here (open access):


Recovery just got a longer runway.



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page